2 The polar form of a complex number
We have seen, above, that the complex number can be represented by a line pointing out from the origin and ending at a point with Cartesian coordinates .
Figure 5
To locate the point P we introduce polar coordinates where is the positive distance from and is the angle measured from the positive -axis, as shown in Figure 5. From the properties of the right-angled triangle there is an obvious relation between and :
or equivalently,
This leads to an alternative way of writing a complex number:
The angle is called the argument of and written, for short, arg . The non-negative real number is the modulus of . We normally consider measured in radians to lie in the interval although any value for integer will be equivalent to . The angle may be expressed in radians or degrees.
Example 4
Find the polar coordinate form of
Solution
-
Here
so that
-
Here
It is natural to assume that . Using this value on your calculator (unless it is very sophisticated) you will obtain a value of about for . This is incorrect since if we use the Argand diagram to plot we get:
Figure 6
The angle is clearly .
This example warns us to take care when determining arg purely using algebra. You will always find it helpful to construct the Argand diagram to locate the particular quadrant into which your complex number is pointing. Your calculator cannot do this for you .
Finally, in this example, .
Task!
Find the polar coordinate form of the complex numbers
Remember, to get the correct angle, draw your complex number on an Argand diagram.
2.1 Multiplication and division using polar coordinates
The reader will perhaps be wondering why we have bothered to introduce the polar form of a complex number. After all, the calculation of arg is not particularly straightforward. However, as we have said, the polar form of a complex number is a much more convenient vehicle to use for multiplication and division of complex numbers. To see why, let us consider two complex numbers in polar form:
Then the product is calculated in the usual way
in which we have used the standard trigonometric identities
We see that in calculating the product that the moduli and multiply together whilst the arguments arg and arg add together.
Task!
If and find the polar expression for
We see that in calculating the quotient that the moduli and divide whilst the arguments arg and arg subtract .
We conclude that addition and subtraction are most easily carried out in Cartesian form whereas multiplication and division are most easily carried out in polar form.
2.2 Complex numbers and rotations
We have seen that, when multiplying one complex number by another, the moduli multiply together and the arguments add together. If, in particular, is a complex number with a modulus
and if is a complex number with modulus 1
(i.e. )
then multiplying by gives
(using Key Point 7)
We see that the effect of multiplying by is to rotate the line representing the complex number anti-clockwise through an angle which is arg , and preserving the length. See Figure 7.
Figure 7
This result would certainly be difficult to obtain had we continued to use the Cartesian form.
Since, in terms of the polar form of a complex number
we see that multiplying a number by produces a rotation through . In particular multiplying a number by and then by again (i.e. ) rotates the number through twice, totalling , which is equivalent to leaving the number unchanged. Hence the introduction of complex numbers has ‘explained’ the accepted (though not obvious) result .
Exercises
- Display, on an Argand diagram, the complex numbers , and .
-
Find the polar form of
- ,
- . Hence calculate
- On an Argand diagram draw the complex number . By changing to polar form examine the effect of multiplying by, in turn, , , , . Represent these new complex numbers on an Argand diagram.
- By utilising the Argand diagram convince yourself that for any two complex numbers . This is known as the triangle inequality .
-
-
.
.
- Each time you multiply through by you effect a rotation through of the line representing the complex number . After four such products you are back to where you started, at .
- This inequality states that no one side of a triangle is greater in length than the sum of the lengths of the other two sides.