3 Inversion of z-transforms using residues
This method has its basis in a branch of mathematics called complex integration. You may recall that the ‘ ’ quantity of z-transforms is a complex quantity, more specifically a complex variable. However, it is not necessary to delve deeply into the theory of complex variables in order to obtain simple inverse z-transforms using what are called residues . In many cases inversion using residues is easier than using partial fractions. Hence reading on is strongly advised.
3.1 Pole of a function of a complex variable
If is a function of the complex variable and if
where is non-zero and finite then is said to have a pole of order at .
For example if
then has the following 3 poles.
- pole of order 1 at
- pole of order 1 at
- pole of order 2 at .
(Poles of order 1 are sometimes known as simple poles.)
Note that when , . Hence is said to be a zero of . (It is the only zero in this case).
Task!
Write down the poles and zeros of
(18)
State the order of each pole.
The residue of a complex function at a first order pole is
Res (19)
The residue at a second order pole is
Res (20)
You need not worry about how these results are obtained or their full mathematical significance. (Any textbook on Complex Variable Theory could be consulted by interested readers.)
Example
Consider again the function (18) in the previous guided exercise.
The second form is the more convenient for the residue formulae to be used.
Using (19) at the two first order poles:
Using (20) at the second order pole
Res
The differentiation has to be carried out before the substitution of of course.
Task!
Carry out the differentiation shown on the last line of the previous page, then substitute and hence obtain the required residue.
Differentiating by the quotient rule then substituting gives
Res
Key Point 15
Residue at a Pole of Order
If has a order pole at
i.e. and finite
Res (21)
This formula reduces to (19) and (20) when and 2 respectively.
3.3 Inverse z-transform formula
Recall that, by definition, the z-transform of a sequence is
If we multiply both sides by where is a positive integer we obtain
Using again a result from complex integration it can be shown from this expression that the general term is given by
sum of residues of at its poles (22)
The poles of will be those of with possibly additional poles at the origin.
To illustrate the residue method of inversion we shall re-do some of the earlier examples that were done using partial fractions.
Example:
so
say.
has first order poles at , so using (19).
We need simply add these residues to obtain the required inverse z-transform
as before.
Task!
Obtain, using (22), the inverse z-transform of
Firstly, obtain the pole(s) of and deduce the order:
whose only pole is one of second order at Now calculate the residue of at using (20) and hence write down the required inverse z-transform :
This is the same as was found by partial fractions, but there is considerably less labour by the residue method.
In the above examples all the poles of the various functions were real. This is the easiest situation but the residue method will cope with complex poles.
Example
We showed earlier that
and
formed a z-transform pair.
We will now obtain if using residues.
Using residues with, from (22),
where
we see that has first order poles at the complex conjugate points .
Using (19)
(Note the complex conjugate residues at the complex conjugate poles.)
Hence
But and , so the inverse -transform is
Task!
Show, using residues, that
Using (22):