2 The Jacobian

Given an integral of the form A f ( x , y ) d x d y

Assume we have a change of variables of the form x = x ( u , v ) and y = y ( u , v ) then the Jacobian of the transformation is defined as

J ( u , v ) = x u x v y u y v

Key Point 10

Jacobian in Two Variables

For given transformations x = x ( u , v ) and y = y ( u , v ) the Jacobian is

J ( u , v ) = x u x v y u y v

Notice the pattern occurring in the x , y , u and v . Across a row of the determinant the numerators are the same and down a column the denominators are the same.

Notation

Different textbooks use different notation for the Jacobian. The following are equivalent.

J ( u , v ) = J ( x , y ; u , v ) = J x , y u , v = ( x , y ) ( u , v )

The Jacobian correctly describes how area elements change under such a transformation. The required relationship is

d x d y J ( u , v ) d u d v

that is, J ( u , v ) d u d v plays the role of d x d y .

Key Point 11

Jacobian for Transforming Areas

When transforming area elements employing the Jacobian it is the modulus of the Jacobian that must be used.

Example 24

Find the area of the circle of radius R .

Figure 30

No alt text was set. Please request alt text from the person who provided you with this resource.

Solution

Let A be the region bounded by a circle of radius R centred at the origin. Then the area of this region is A d A . We will calculate this area by changing to polar coordinates, so consider the usual transformation x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ from cartesian to polar coordinates. First we require all the partial derivatives

x r = cos θ y r = sin θ x θ = r sin θ y θ = r cos θ

Thus

J ( r , θ ) = x r x θ y r y θ = cos θ r sin θ sin θ r cos θ = cos θ × r cos θ r sin θ × sin θ = r cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = r

This confirms the previous result for polar coordinates, d x d y r d r d θ . The limits on r are r = 0 (centre) to r = R (edge). The limits on θ are θ = 0 to θ = 2 π , i.e. starting to the right and going once round anticlockwise. The required area is

A d A = 0 2 π 0 R J ( r , θ ) d r d θ = 0 2 π 0 R r d r d θ = 2 π R 2 2 = π R 2

Note that here r > 0 so J ( r , θ ) = J ( r , θ ) = r .

Example 25

The diamond shaped region A in Figure 31(a) is bounded by the lines x + 2 y = 2 , x 2 y = 2 , x + 2 y = 2 and x 2 y = 2 . We wish to evaluate the integral

I = A 3 x + 6 y 2 d A

over this region. Since the region A is neither vertically nor horizontally simple, evaluating I without changing coordinates would require separating the region into two simple triangular regions. So we use a change of coordinates to transform A to a square region in Figure 31(b) and evaluate I .

Figures 31 (a) and (b)

No alt text was set. Please request alt text from the person who provided you with this resource.

Solution

By considering the equations of the boundary lines of region A it is easy to see that the change of coordinates

d u = x + 2 y ( 1 ) v = x 2 y ( 2 )

will transform the boundary lines to u = 2 , u = 2 , v = 2 and v = 2 . These values of u and v are the new limits of integration. The region A will be transformed to the square region A shown above.

We require the inverse transformations so that we can substitute for x and y in terms of u and v . By adding (1) and (2) we obtain u + v = 2 x and by subtracting (1) and (2) we obtain u v = 4 y , thus the required change of coordinates is

x = 1 2 u + v y = 1 4 u v

Substituting for x and y in the integrand ( 3 x + 6 y ) 2 of I gives

3 2 ( u + v ) + 6 4 ( u v ) 2 = 9 u 2

We have the new limits of integration and the new form of the integrand, we now require the Jacobian. The required partial derivatives are

x u = 1 2 x v = 1 2 y u = 1 4 y v = 1 4

Then the Jacobian is

J ( u , v ) = 1 2   1 2 1 4 1 4 = 1 4

Then d A = J ( u , v ) d A = 1 4 d A . Using the new limits, integrand and the Jacobian, the integral can be written

I = 2 2 2 2 9 4 u 2 d u d v .

You should evaluate this integral and check that I = 48 .

Task!

This Task concerns using a transformation to evaluate ( x 2 + y 2 ) d x d y .

  1. Given the transformations u = x + y , v = x y express x and y in terms of u and v to find the inverse transformations:

    u = x + y (1)

    v = x y (2)

    Add equations (1) and (2) u + v = 2 x

    Subtract equation (2) from equation (1) u v = 2 y

    So x = 1 2 ( u + v ) y = 1 2 ( u v )

  2. Find the Jacobian J ( u , v ) for the transformation in part (a):

    Evaluating the partial derivatives, x u = 1 2 x v = 1 2 y u = 1 2 and y v = 1 2 so the Jacobian x u x v y u y v = 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 = 1 4 1 4 = 1 2

  3. Express the integral I = x 2 + y 2 d x d y in terms of u and v , using the transformations introduced in 1. and the Jacobian found in 2.:

    On letting x = 1 2 ( u + v ) , y = 1 2 ( u v ) and d x d y = J d u d v = 1 2 d u d v , the integral x 2 + y 2 d x d y becomes

    I = 1 4 ( u + v ) 2 + 1 4 ( u v ) 2 × 1 2 d u d v = 1 2 u 2 + v 2 × 1 2 d u d v = 1 4 u 2 + v 2 d u d v
  4. Find the limits on u and v for the rectangle with vertices  ( x , y ) = ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) , ( 1 , 5 ) , ( 3 , 3 ) :

    For ( 0 , 0 ), u = 0 and v = 0

    For ( 2 , 2 ), u = 4 and v = 0

    For ( 1 , 5 ), u = 4 and v = 6

    For ( 3 , 3 ), u = 0 and v = 6

    Thus, the limits on u are u = 0 to u = 4 while the limits on v are v = 6 to v = 0 .

  5. Finally evaluate I :

    The integral is

    I = v = 6 0 u = 0 4 1 4 u 2 + v 2 d u d v = 1 4 v = 6 0 1 3 u 3 + u v 2 u = 0 4 d u d v = v = 6 0 16 3 + v 2 d v = 16 3 v + 1 3 v 3 6 0 = 0 16 3 × ( 6 ) + 1 3 × ( 216 ) = 104