2 Numerical solutions

The approach we will adopt is similar to that seen in Section 32.4 where we looked at parabolic equations. We use the notation

u j n

to denote an approximation to u evaluated at x = j × δ x , t = n × δ t . Approximating the derivatives in the PDE

u t t = c 2 u x

by central differences we obtain the numerical difference equation

u j n + 1 2 u j n + u j n 1 ( δ t ) 2 = c 2 u j + 1 n 2 u j n + u j 1 n ( δ x ) 2 .

Multiplying through by ( δ t ) 2 this can be rearranged to give

u j n + 1 = 2 u j n u j n 1 + μ 2 ( u j + 1 n 2 u j n + u j 1 n )

in which μ = c δ t δ x is called the Courant number.

The equation above gives u j n + 1 in terms of u -approximations at earlier time-steps (that is, all the appearances of u on the right-hand side have a superscript smaller than n + 1 ).

Figure 9

No alt text was set. Please request alt text from the person who provided you with this resource.

Thinking of the numerical stencil graphically we have the situation shown above. We may think of the values on the right-hand side of the equation “pointing to" a new value on the left-hand side.

Key Point 22

Timesteps (other than the first one) are carried out by using the numerical stencil

u j n + 1 = 2 u j n u j n 1 + μ 2 ( u j + 1 n 2 u j n + u j 1 n ) “new" approximation “old" approximations at at  ( n + 1 ) th   time-step earlier time-steps

(We will deal with how to carry out the first time-step shortly.)

The time-stepping process has much in common with the corresponding procedure for parabolic problems. The following Example will help establish the general idea.

Example 18

Given that u = u ( x , t ) satisfies the wave equation u t t = c 2 u x x in t > 0 and 0 < x < 1 with boundary conditions u ( 0 , t ) = u ( 1 , t ) = 0 ( t > 0 ) with wave speed c = 1.2 .

The numerical method    u j n + 1 = 2 u j n u j n 1 + μ 2 ( u j + 1 n 2 u j n + u j 1 n )   where μ = c δ t δ x , is implemented using δ x = 0.25 and δ t = 0.1 .

Suppose that, after 5 time-steps, the following data forms part of the numerical solution:

u 0 4 = 0.0000 u 0 5 = 0.0000 u 1 4 = 0.9242 u 1 5 = 0.7110 u 2 4 = 0.0020 u 2 5 = 0.0059 u 3 4 = 0.9624 u 3 5 = 0.7409 u 4 4 = 0.0000 u 4 5 = 0.0000

Carry out the next time-step so as to find an approximation to u at t = 6 δ t .

Solution

In this case μ = 1.2 × 0.1 0.25 = 0.48 and the required time-step is carried out as follows:

u 0 6 = 0 from the boundary condition u 1 6 = 2 u 1 5 u 1 4 + μ 2 ( u 2 5 2 u 1 5 + u 0 5 ) = 0.1689 u 2 6 = 2 u 2 5 u 2 4 + μ 2 ( u 3 5 2 u 2 5 + u 1 5 ) = 0.0140 u 3 6 = 2 u 3 5 u 3 4 + μ 2 ( u 4 5 2 u 3 5 + u 2 5 ) = 0.1794 u 4 6 = 0 from the boundary condition

to 4 decimal places and these are the approximations to u ( 0 , 6 δ t ) , u ( 0.25 , 6 δ t ) , u ( 0.5 , 6 δ t ) , u ( 0.75 , 6 δ t ) and u ( 1 , 6 δ t ) , respectively.

The diagram below shows the numerical results that appeared in the example above. It can be seen that the example was a (rather coarse) model of a standing wave with two antinodes.

Figure 10

No alt text was set. Please request alt text from the person who provided you with this resource.

Task!

Suppose that u = u ( x , t ) satisfies the wave equation u t t = c 2 u x x in t > 0 and 0 < x < 1 . It is given that u satisfies boundary conditions u ( 0 , t ) = u ( 1 , t ) = 0 ( t > 0 ) and initial conditions that need not be stated for the purposes of this question. The application is such that the wave speed c = 1.2 .

The numerical method u j n + 1 = 2 u j n u j n 1 + μ 2 ( u j + 1 n 2 u j n + u j 1 n )   where μ = c δ t δ x , is implemented using δ x = 0.25 and δ t = 0.2 .

Suppose that, after 8 time-steps, the following data forms part of the numerical solution:

u 0 7 = 0.0000 u 0 8 = 0.0000 u 1 7 = 0.6423 u 1 8 = 0.4640 u 2 7 = 0.8976 u 2 8 = 0.6792 u 3 7 = 0.6789 u 3 8 = 0.4668 u 4 7 = 0.0000 u 4 8 = 0.0000

Carry out the next time-step so as to find an approximation to u at t = 9 δ t .

In this case μ = 1.2 × 0.2 0.25 = 0.96 and the required time-step is carried out as follows:

u 0 9 = 0 from the boundary condition u 1 9 = 2 u 1 8 u 1 7 + μ 2 ( u 2 8 2 u 1 8 + u 0 8 ) = 0.0564 u 2 9 = 2 u 2 8 u 2 7 + μ 2 ( u 3 8 2 u 2 8 + u 1 8 ) = 0.0667 u 3 9 = 2 u 3 8 u 3 7 + μ 2 ( u 4 8 2 u 3 8 + u 2 8 ) = 0.0202 u 4 9 = 0 from the boundary condition

to 4 decimal places and these are the approximations to u ( 0 , 9 δ t ) , u ( 0.25 , 9 δ t ) , u ( 0.5 , 9 δ t ) , u ( 0.75 , 9 δ t ) and u ( 1 , 9 δ t ) , respectively.

The above Task concerns a stretched string oscillating in such a way that at the 9 th time-step the string is approximately flat. The motion continues with u taking negative values. Figure 11 below uses data calculated above, and also data for the next two time-steps so as to show subsequent progress of the solution.

Figure 11

No alt text was set. Please request alt text from the person who provided you with this resource.